Best Rated Lawyers For The Victim Compensation Fund?

I think not.

The problem with my question is that I am asking the wrong question, because it all depends on what you mean by ‘best’ and why you want to know this. The reason we need a victim compensation fund in the first place is because it is often cheaper for victims of crime than going through an expensive court process (which can be very long and time consuming). So research has shown that damages paid out under damages schemes are typically about 35% less than those awarded in court proceedings (and there is no doubt they cost more money overall), which makes sense when we look at how much effort these cases require from professionals such as solicitors, barristers etc. It seems reasonable to assume that if one were required to pay 40p per pound of damage award, then perhaps the quality of representation provided would also be reduced. But who would say so? Certainly not me! And nor should anyone else judge their own service based on affordability alone: just like buying a house or car do not always lead people to choose cheaper ones, neither does affordability necessarily determine legal performance – we all have different budgets and criteria when deciding where we spend our cash; even though many people may fall into categories such as ‘cheap but poor quality’ or ‘expensive but excellent quality’ some seek value for money while others demand excellence . Of course some will go further still and make decisions based upon qualitative considerations relating to personal values rather than quantitative ones related

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *